The New Hampshire Federation of Republican Women proudly endorses @CarlaGericke for State Representative! We need to elect Carla and keep NH red!
— New Hampshire Federation of Republican Women (@NHFRW) October 3, 2024
✅ Remember to VOTE Republican on November 5th! @CTEHR @NHHouseGOP #nhpolitics #empoweredwomenempowerwomen pic.twitter.com/9JWPEN3LKr
Get this… I posted a reel on FB and used a song from their library–Jesus Jones’ “Right Here Right Now”–on a post about a blockchain conference that took place in the Free State of New Hampshire this past weekend…
This morning, after I shared it to an FSP group last night, I notice the privacy setting had changed to “locked”–my posts are generally public–so I went to investigate…
My post now has a copyright ding from Warner Music on it… BUT, if you want to submit a dispute, the SUBMIT BUTTON DOESN’T WORK…
When you factor in I literally told my husband last week that this will be the next way corporatists censor speech (I used to do IP law in Silicon Valley, mind you), I don’t know what to think…
Is it a simple issue, like I have used that song on a reel before (I have)? If so, WHY DOESN’T THE DISPUTE BUTTON WORK?
Is it something more nefarious? When you consider how many times in how many ways I have been censored on social media, I’m pretty sure this is a newfangled lawfare approach to censor speech…. Note how looks like the song is OK almost everywhere, but not in the USA?
When Facebook started the practice of providing the music I thought, Huh, wouldn’t it be interesting if they use copyright infringement claims to take down dissident content in the future… I don’t know for sure that this is where we are, but something is mos def sus…
The Free State Blockchain Digital Asset Conference was amazing. More details to come!
This is my post-TSA gate rape face.
Why? For about a decade, I opted out of the scanner, but a few years ago, I had such a shocking experience–the female agent literally stuck her finger into my lady parts–that I started to “obey.”
My last defiance is doing a double bird–FU fingers in the air–in the scanner.
This has resulted in interesting verbal exchanges.
TSA agent: “I saw what you did in there.”
Me, leaning in: “Good.”
Today? They claimed my nether regions–ensconced in leggings–“alerted”.
Total bullshit.
Probably retaliatory.
I’ll keep zapping the bird, but if I get another “random alert” resulting in another traumatic gate rape experience, I **will** sue.
Rights not asserted are lost.
I have the Constitutionally protected right to flip off Big Bro. And they don’t get to stick their dirty statist fingers up my cooch in retaliation. (As I’m writing this, I recognize that there is deep-rooted trauma this experience has exposed. I will try to write a more comprehensive essay later.)
Then you see stuff like this, and it makes you go, Hmm.
This post generated a lot of social media interest.
This is my post-TSA gate rape face.
— Carla Gericke, Live Free And Thrive! (@CarlaGericke) August 16, 2024
Why? For about a decade, I opted out of the scanner, but a few years ago, I had such a shocking experience–the female agent literally stuck her finger into my lady parts–that I started to "obey."
My last defiance is doing a double… pic.twitter.com/SO6CAKRauw
I decided to make some GROK art… let’s call it a new category: TSA MOLESTATION ART. I didn’t have time to tweak these to perfection, but you get the gist.
Based on questions I asked AI generators, I have compiled the following list of criticisms to Veep pick Tim Walz:
a. Violent Crime Spike: From 2019 to 2021, Minnesota saw a sharp rise in violent crime, reaching its highest level in more than a decade. This includes significant increases in murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, and human trafficking (Minnesota Compass) (Alpha News).
b. Record Homicides: The state set all-time records for homicides in consecutive years, with 201 homicides in 2021, a substantial increase from 104 in 2018, the year before Walz took office (Alpha News).
c. Aggravated Assaults and Carjackings: Aggravated assaults rose by 33.7% from 2020 to 2021, and for the first time, the state tracked carjackings, reporting 779 incidents statewide in 2021 (Alpha News).
d. Increased Crime in Metro Areas: The increase in violent crime was particularly pronounced in the seven-county metro area, where it rose by 23.9%, compared to a 16% increase in Greater Minnesota (Alpha News).
e. Criticism of Public Safety Policies: Critics argue that Walz’s public safety policies, including judicial appointments and sentencing guidelines, have contributed to the rise in crime. They claim these policies have been lenient on violent offenders, leading to a perception of reduced accountability (Star Tribune).
Tell me more about the news source “alpha news”… when did it start, who are the funders, etc., giving a comprehensive summary
Searched 6 sites
Alpha News is a Minnesota-based online news network that launched in 2015. The platform primarily covers state and local government issues, with a strong emphasis on topics favored by the political right. It was initially promoted by the Minnesota Tea Party Alliance, reflecting its conservative leanings.
Alpha News is known for its right-leaning bias and has been categorized as a questionable source by Media Bias/Fact Check due to poor sourcing, promotion of conspiracy theories, and a lack of transparency regarding ownership and funding. The platform relies on revenue from advertising and private donors, although specific funders are not disclosed publicly (Media Bias/Fact Check) (InfluenceWatch) (Star Tribune).
The content on Alpha News often includes stories that are critical of progressive policies and public figures, and it has been criticized for spreading misinformation and engaging in Islamophobic rhetoric. The site has a small team of journalists, including notable figures like Liz Collin, a former WCCO-TV reporter who has won multiple Emmy Awards (A Better Minnesota) (Alpha News).
For more detailed information, you can visit their official website or refer to comprehensive reviews on platforms like Media Bias/Fact Check and Influence Watch.
do the same analysis for Media Bias/Fact CheckChatGPT
Searched 5 sites
History and Purpose: Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) was founded in 2015 by Dave Van Zandt. The website aims to educate the public on media bias and deceptive news practices, striving to promote straightforward news reporting and combat misinformation. MBFC evaluates the political bias and factual accuracy of news sources using a combination of objective measures and subjective analysis.
Methodology: MBFC follows a strict methodology for determining the biases of sources, which involves examining article content, language, and the presence of partisan bias. They classify sources into categories such as “Left,” “Left-Center,” “Least Biased,” “Right-Center,” and “Right.” The assessments are carried out by a team led by Van Zandt, with support from volunteers who assist in research and evaluations.
Funding: The website is funded through reader donations, third-party advertising, and membership subscriptions. The use of third-party advertising is intended to prevent bias by not selecting specific ads, although it can result in politically biased ads appearing based on users’ browsing history and site content.
Content and Services: MBFC provides several services, including:
Criticism and Challenges: Despite its mission, MBFC has faced criticism regarding its methodologies and the subjective nature of bias classification. Some argue that its ratings can oversimplify complex biases present in media sources. Additionally, the site’s reliance on advertising has led to occasional criticism about the types of ads displayed.
For more information, you can visit the Media Bias/Fact Check website or check out their methodology and funding details.
Sources:
DISCLAIMER: I don’t trust the AI generators, and neither should you, but I want to capture this information for posterity.
As I sometimes do, I wanted to see what in the world the AIs have been programmed to say about Commie Kamala’s Veep pick. Below is the question I asked, and the answers I got. As always, please note my disclaimer at the bottom.
write a critical analysis of Walz’s career, including things like whether he completed his military training, his ties to China, and what happened to MN under his governorship
Tim Walz has a diverse background, having served in the military, worked in education, and held political office. However, his career has not been without controversy.
Regarding his military service, there have been questions raised about his record. Some have accused him of embellishing or selectively omitting facts about his service. Specifically, it has been claimed that he quit his military service when he found out his unit would be sent to Iraq. It’s also been reported that he failed to complete the United States Army Sergeants Major Academy and did not serve for two years following completion of the course.
Walz’s ties to China have also been a point of contention. He spent several years teaching in China, which is unusual for someone from a rural area in Nebraska who was also serving in the Army National Guard. This has led some to question his loyalty and suggest that he may have ties to the Chinese Communist Party.
As for his governorship of Minnesota, Walz has implemented a number of liberal policies, including free college tuition for low-income students, free meals for schoolchildren, legal recreational marijuana, and protections for transgender people. He has also signed a bill guaranteeing Minnesotans a “fundamental right to make autonomous decisions” about reproductive health care. However, his administration has not been without criticism. Some have accused him of fueling BLM riots in 2020, which led to looting and destruction in Minneapolis. There have also been calls to change the Minnesota state flag to resemble Somalia’s, and he has been criticized for pushing a “radical” agenda.
In summary, Tim Walz’s career has been marked by controversy and criticism. His military service, ties to China, and governorship of Minnesota have all been sources of contention. While he has implemented a number of liberal policies as governor, his administration has faced criticism from both the left and the right.
write a critical analysis of Walz’s career, including things like whether he completed his military training, his ties to China, and what happened to MN under his governorship
Tim Walz served in the National Guard for 24 years, achieving the rank of Command Sergeant Major. His military career is notable for its length and the leadership roles he assumed. However, there has been scrutiny regarding the specifics of his military training and deployment. Critics have questioned whether he completed certain advanced training programs typically expected of someone in his rank. Despite this, Walz’s military service has been a significant part of his public persona, often emphasizing his commitment to service and leadership.
Throughout his political career, Walz has been involved in discussions and decisions regarding international trade, including relations with China. As a U.S. Congressman, he supported policies that aimed to strengthen trade relations with China, which some critics argue has contributed to economic challenges faced by American workers due to outsourcing and trade imbalances. However, supporters of Walz argue that fostering strong international trade relationships is crucial for economic growth and competitiveness.
Tim Walz was elected as the Governor of Minnesota in 2018, succeeding Mark Dayton. His tenure as governor has been marked by several significant events and policy decisions:
Tim Walz’s career is characterized by a blend of military service, legislative work, and executive leadership. His tenure as governor has been particularly eventful, with both commendable achievements and notable controversies. His military background, while generally respected, has some questioned aspects. His ties to China reflect the complex nature of global trade politics. In governing Minnesota, Walz has navigated unprecedented challenges, with decisions that have garnered both praise and criticism. As with any public figure, his legacy will likely be viewed through various lenses, influenced by political perspectives and the evolving context of his policies and actions.
List the top 10 things any voter should know about Walz if the media was free and fair
Name 10 things a Republican would not like about Walz
did crime increase in MN under walz?
Searched 4 sites
Under Tim Walz’s governorship, crime rates in Minnesota experienced a notable increase. Here are some key points regarding the rise in crime during his tenure:
In summary, under Tim Walz’s governorship, Minnesota has experienced significant increases in violent crime, including record-setting homicides and sharp rises in aggravated assaults and carjackings. These trends have been a focal point of criticism from political opponents and public safety advocates.
ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.
QUEEN QUILL DISCLAIMER: I don’t believe everything the AI generators say, I simply record these exchanges for posterity
And… this is why you shouldn’t trust the AI:
neutrally but factually describe Walz military service from start to finish
Tim Walz’s military service began in 1981 when he enlisted in the Army National Guard. He served with the Nebraska Army National Guard until 1996, achieving the rank of Command Sergeant Major. During his time in the Guard, Walz participated in various training exercises and deployments, gaining experience and demonstrating leadership.
In 1989, Walz transitioned to the Minnesota Army National Guard. His service included a deployment to Italy in support of Operation Enduring Freedom in 2003. Throughout his military career, Walz earned numerous awards and decorations, reflecting his dedication and commitment to service.
Walz retired from the National Guard in 2005 after 24 years of service. His military career was marked by steady progression through the ranks and a commitment to serving both his state and country.
did he not quit a week before being deployed to Iraq?
Tim Walz did not deploy to Iraq with his unit. In 2004, Walz retired from the Minnesota Army National Guard shortly before his unit was deployed to Iraq. He retired as a Command Sergeant Major after 24 years of service. This decision was influenced by his desire to focus on his teaching career and his congressional campaign, which he launched shortly thereafter.
Why did you not mention this when I asked the first question? Is it not factually pertinent given he running as VP?
You are right; it is factually pertinent to mention that Tim Walz retired from the Minnesota Army National Guard shortly before his unit was deployed to Iraq, particularly given his current political profile and potential candidacy as Vice President. Here is a revised, factually complete description of his military service:
Tim Walz’s military service began in 1981 when he enlisted in the Army National Guard. He served with the Nebraska Army National Guard until 1996, achieving the rank of Command Sergeant Major. In 1989, he transitioned to the Minnesota Army National Guard. His service included participation in various training exercises and deployments, including a deployment to Italy in support of Operation Enduring Freedom in 2003.
In 2004, Walz retired from the Minnesota Army National Guard shortly before his unit was deployed to Iraq. This decision was influenced by his desire to focus on his teaching career and his congressional campaign, which he launched shortly thereafter. Walz’s military career spanned 24 years, marked by steady progression through the ranks and a commitment to serving both his state and country.
write a critical analysis of Walz’s career, including things like whether he completed his military training, his ties to China, and what happened to MN under his governorship
Tim Walz has a diverse background, having served in the military, worked in education, and held political office. However, his career has not been without controversy.
Regarding his military service, there have been questions raised about his record. Some have accused him of embellishing or selectively omitting facts about his service. Specifically, it has been claimed that he quit his military service when he found out his unit would be sent to Iraq. It’s also been reported that he failed to complete the United States Army Sergeants Major Academy and did not serve for two years following completion of the course.
Walz’s ties to China have also been a point of contention. He spent several years teaching in China, which is unusual for someone from a rural area in Nebraska who was also serving in the Army National Guard. This has led some to question his loyalty and suggest that he may have ties to the Chinese Communist Party.
As for his governorship of Minnesota, Walz has implemented a number of liberal policies, including free college tuition for low-income students, free meals for schoolchildren, legal recreational marijuana, and protections for transgender people. He has also signed a bill guaranteeing Minnesotans a “fundamental right to make autonomous decisions” about reproductive health care. However, his administration has not been without criticism. Some have accused him of fueling BLM riots in 2020, which led to looting and destruction in Minneapolis. There have also been calls to change the Minnesota state flag to resemble Somalia’s, and he has been criticized for pushing a “radical” agenda.
In summary, Tim Walz’s career has been marked by controversy and criticism. His military service, ties to China, and governorship of Minnesota have all been sources of contention. While he has implemented a number of liberal policies as governor, his administration has faced criticism from both the left and the right.
write a critical analysis of Walz’s career, including things like whether he completed his military training, his ties to China, and what happened to MN under his governorship
Tim Walz served in the National Guard for 24 years, achieving the rank of Command Sergeant Major. His military career is notable for its length and the leadership roles he assumed. However, there has been scrutiny regarding the specifics of his military training and deployment. Critics have questioned whether he completed certain advanced training programs typically expected of someone in his rank. Despite this, Walz’s military service has been a significant part of his public persona, often emphasizing his commitment to service and leadership.
Throughout his political career, Walz has been involved in discussions and decisions regarding international trade, including relations with China. As a U.S. Congressman, he supported policies that aimed to strengthen trade relations with China, which some critics argue has contributed to economic challenges faced by American workers due to outsourcing and trade imbalances. However, supporters of Walz argue that fostering strong international trade relationships is crucial for economic growth and competitiveness.
Tim Walz was elected as the Governor of Minnesota in 2018, succeeding Mark Dayton. His tenure as governor has been marked by several significant events and policy decisions:
Catch me on Dr. Phil talking about NHExit Now! What an incredible opportunity to shape the discussion about states’ rights and secession! While, unsurprisingly, Dr. Phil thinks D.C. can still be saved, the smart peoples’ money is on that not being the case.
I have 36 trillion reasons (and counting) for Granite Staters to vote to secede and forge our own, better futures!
Fans always warn me about how badly the MSM will treat me, but my mantra has become, The only thing you can control is yourself. I knew I’d done a good job even right after the interview–and the producer meeting me backstage and saying I slayed, helped–but I was curious to see how they would edit the show.
During the taping, I had a spontaneous applause line and a few laugh lines, including one when I said, “No one is going to get Social Security.” The other laugh line about the INS likely regretting issuing me a lottery Green Card, and I don’t recall exactly what the applause line was about, but I know I dominated the conversation (that same producer told me to BRING IT beforehand) and had made an excellent point. The laugh line made it in; the applause line did not.
I was aware that I had flubbed a few words here and there… it’s partly being bilingual and sometimes actively translating in my mind as I am speaking and/or it’s when I’m talking super-fast because I’m seizing airspace. All three “flubs” made it in. And yet, they still couldn’t nail me because: All you can control is your own behavior.
After the taping, we were asked to do short one-on-ones with the social media guy. I noticed in this Merit Street Media promo below that they’re using that footage to promote the one guy on the show who had all the Statist D.C. talking points. Once someone calls you a Russian asset, you know they are compromised. How do I know, you say? Because I am not a Russian asset? LOL
Secession movements have sprung up in multiple states due to the urban-rural political divide and much more. Tap to download the Merit+ app and watch this episode of @drphil Primetime: https://t.co/8idoq0Gd5l #meritstreet #news #meritstreetmedia #drphil #secession pic.twitter.com/eq46dMO6qa
— Merit Street | Providing Clarity & Solutions (@MeritStreet) July 30, 2024
While the episode premiered live last night on Merit Street Media, it will also re-air at 4 pm today, 5 pm and 11 pm on Saturday and 2 pm on Sunday. Additionally, it will be available on demand to watch any time on the Merit+ app.
Catch the full episode on censor-proof Odysee HERE.
I will be writing a more comprehensive essay that outlines the arguments in our discussion, including some of the parts that were edited out. I am also now working on a nonfiction book, NHEXIT NOW: AN APPEAL TO HEAVEN which will drop before the end of the year. In the meantime, stay tuned and stay free!
Check out this comprehensive article about my upcoming appearance on the Dr. Phil Primetime show.
“Carla Gericke, who is running for the New Hampshire House of Representatives as a Republican while promoting the “NHExit Now” push for secession, will be featured on “Dr. Phil Primetime” alongside a Texas secessionist and other guests.
Gericke, who has also been a leader with the Free State Project — a group that aims to attract libertarian-minded movers to transform New Hampshire’s political identity — said she is working to promote the principles of liberty, self-determination, and the state’s unique heritage and values as the national debt skyrockets and the federal government keeps expanding.
“Being given the opportunity to discuss an amicable national divorce on a platform like Dr. Phil’s is a gift,” Gericke said in a statement. “As this movement reaches the mainstream, it is crucial for people to understand that while New Hampshire’s motto is ‘Live Free or Die,’ our movement is a peaceful one.”
Gericke emigrated to the United States from South Africa in 1996, moved from New York to New Hampshire in 2008, and became known by the Free State Project as “Queen Quill” for her subsequent leadership roles in a movement that has adopted the porcupine as its mascot. She won a federal court case on appeal in 2014 affirming a right to record police during a traffic stop, and she was named that year among New Hampshire Magazine’s “Remarkable Women.””
Last night’s New Hampshire Liberty Alliance dinner, fondly called “Liberty Prom,” was a blast!
Congratulations to Legislator of the Year and soon to be NH Senator Emily Phillips and Activist of the Year, Jeremy Olson, who currently runs the Merrimack Valley Porcupines meeting, held on the first Saturday of the month at the Quill.
Huge shout out to Melissa and Jeffrey Creem for their continued and stalwart support and efforts with the NHLA!
To everyone who made last night a smashing success, THANK YOU. It is because of the relentless efforts of freedom fighters like you that NH will forever remain the Free State!
Live free or die, live free and thrive!
Check out these photos and feel free to tag yourself!
Criticize Kamala Harris as though you were a judge building a case against her as president of USChatGPT
Criticizing Kamala Harris as if building a case against her presidency involves examining her record, policy positions, and public perception. Here’s a structured argument:
While Kamala Harris has a commendable career with significant achievements, these points highlight areas of concern that critics might use to argue against her potential presidency. The case against her is built on perceived inconsistencies, policy shifts, leadership challenges, and questions about her ability to effectively unite and lead the country.
4o
Who are Kamala Harris’s top 10 funders?ChatGPT
Searched 2 sites
Kamala Harris’s top funders include a mix of political action committees, large individual donors, and industry groups. Here are some notable contributors:
These donors reflect Harris’s broad support base from key sectors like technology, healthcare, and media (Politico).
4o
Is Kamala Harris a US citizen? ChatGPT
Yes, Kamala Harris is a U.S. citizen. She was born on October 20, 1964, in Oakland, California, which makes her a natural-born citizen of the United States. Her mother, Shyamala Gopalan, was an Indian cancer researcher, and her father, Donald Harris, is a Jamaican-American economist. Her birth in the United States automatically grants her citizenship under the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
QUEEN QUILL DISCLAIMER: I don’t believe everything ChatGPT says, I simply record these exchanges for posterity.
make the case, based on publicly available information, that Hillary Clinton is a Russian asset
ChatGPT
The claim that Hillary Clinton is a Russian asset is widely regarded as a baseless conspiracy theory. However, if one were to attempt to make such a case based on publicly available information, it would likely involve a misinterpretation or selective use of certain events and statements. Here is how such an argument might be constructed:
It is crucial to note that these points have been widely debunked and lack substantive evidence. Multiple investigations, including by the U.S. intelligence community and bipartisan congressional committees, have found no credible evidence to support the notion that Hillary Clinton is a Russian asset. This argument is typically used in partisan political rhetoric rather than based on factual analysis.
4o
You state ” frequently suggested without evidence that Clinton had improper ties to Russia” while also admitting the Uranium One deal occurred. Why is that?
ChatGPT
The Uranium One deal is often cited in discussions about Hillary Clinton and alleged ties to Russia, but the context and evidence surrounding the deal do not support the claim that Clinton had improper ties to Russia. Here’s a detailed explanation:
In summary, while the Uranium One deal did occur and has been used to suggest improper ties, the available evidence and investigations do not support the claim that Hillary Clinton is a Russian asset. The deal and the related donations to the Clinton Foundation have been scrutinized extensively, and no wrongdoing has been found.
4o
What about Hillary Clinton’s servers?
ChatGPT
The controversy surrounding Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server while she was Secretary of State has been a significant issue, but it is not directly related to allegations of being a Russian asset. Here’s a detailed explanation of the email server issue:
In summary, the controversy over Hillary Clinton’s private email server involved questions about compliance with State Department policies and potential security risks, but it did not provide evidence of her being a Russian asset. The investigations into her email practices concluded that there was no intentional misconduct or evidence of classified information being compromised by foreign adversaries.
QUEEN QUILL DISCLAIMER: I don’t believe everything ChatGPT says, I simply record these exchanges for posterity.