I’m confused… Are you insinuating that people who have done their own research on the efficacy and safety of these novel experimental gene therapeutics (including reading original sourced studies), for which the companies cannot be held liable if something goes wrong, and for which the clinical trials have not been completed, for which only emergency authorization technically exists, for which there are no long term studies, and for which the companies involved all have a long and documented track record of harming their customers, including paying the largest criminal fine in the history of the world, and for which they are so confident that they have actively suppressed, censored, and banned any counter-studies or narratives critical of “the science” while also having a revolving door between the regulators and the companies… for a virus that has a 99.7% survival rate… are you saying this is the equivalent of believing the earth is flat?
I guess you also think people can give informed consent when:
Contracts between Big Pharma and government are redacted or secret;
Reports and studies relied upon by regulatory bodies to give approval are not 100% public (and the FOIA request is delayed in increments through 2076);
ALL ingredients are not disclosed;
Clinical trials have not been completed;
VAERS data is useless.
But please, keep bringing the snark, and I’ll hopefully catch you on the flip side of your boosters!
