Carla Gericke
Day 115 of My Living Xperiment: Liberty Forum kicks off (I forgot to jump on earlier!)… Welcome!¡ https://t.co/jPSzEVtJ62
— Carla Gericke, Live Free And Thrive! (@CarlaGericke) April 25, 2025
Day 113 of My Living Xperiment: Ugh, another one of these?!?! Lol https://t.co/TG2D54a5wS
— Carla Gericke, Live Free And Thrive! (@CarlaGericke) April 23, 2025
Day 113 of My Living Xperiment: Ugh, another one of these?!?! Lol https://t.co/TG2D54a5wS
— Carla Gericke, Live Free And Thrive! (@CarlaGericke) April 23, 2025
Day 112 of My Living Xperiment: It's "Earth Day," so let's talk "grounding." Big Sole vs. Big Soul??? https://t.co/uYQDb3chbI
— Carla Gericke, Live Free And Thrive! (@CarlaGericke) April 22, 2025
AI and I: When The Most Obvious Culprits Are Ignored, They Are Telling You Something By Not Telling You Something
Ran across this post and wondered about the accuracy of the claims, also, since the obvious culprits, the vaccines given to the world, were not included at all (a tell), I was curious…
YOUNG HEART ATTACKS SURGE: DRUGS, DISSECTIONS, STRESS & WEIGHT
— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) April 22, 2025
Heart attacks among Americans under 40 have jumped 66% since 2019, rising from 0.3% to 0.5% of the population.
Doctors point to four major drivers: rising use of ADHD stimulants like Adderall and Ritalin,… https://t.co/H7LwG5KRka pic.twitter.com/OsLerF37rv
The claim that heart attacks among Americans over 40 have risen 66% since 2019, as stated in an X post by @MarioNawfal, lacks corroboration from primary sources like the CDC or American Heart Association (AHA) in the provided data. However, assuming the premise reflects a real trend, I’ll evaluate potential reasons beyond the four cited drivers (ADHD stimulants, spontaneous coronary artery dissection [SCAD], crime-related stress, and obesity), critically examining the evidence and considering other plausible factors. The response will align with the AHA’s 2023 and 2022 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics, peer-reviewed studies, and other credible sources, while addressing the context of cardiovascular health post-2019. I’ll also clarify the limitations of the 66% figure and provide a chart summarizing key risk factors for clarity.
Context and Verification of the 66% Claim
The X post cites a 66% increase in heart attacks among Americans over 40, from 0.3% to 0.5% of the population since 2019. This translates to a relative increase but a small absolute change, roughly aligning with rising cardiovascular disease (CVD) trends noted in younger and middle-aged adults. The AHA’s 2023 Update reports 805,000 heart attacks annually in the U.S., with 1 in 5 occurring in adults under 65, and a 2019 ACC study notes a 2% annual rise in heart attacks among those under 40 from 2000–2016, suggesting a gradual uptick. However, no specific post-2019 data confirms a 66% jump for the over-40 group, so the figure may be exaggerated or context-specific (e.g., a single hospital dataset). I’ll proceed assuming a significant rise, focusing on alternative reasons while noting this limitation.
The cited drivers—ADHD stimulants, SCAD, crime-related stress, and obesity—are plausible but incomplete. ADHD stimulants (e.g., Adderall) show mixed evidence, with a 2024 study linking them to a slight cardiomyopathy risk (0.72% vs. 0.53% after 10 years), but a 2022 meta-analysis of 3.9 million participants found no significant CVD association. SCAD is rare, primarily affecting younger women, and doesn’t explain broad trends. Crime-related stress lacks quantitative backing as a primary driver, and while obesity is a major factor (40% prevalence per CDC), it’s not new since 2019. Below, I explore other, potentially more obvious reasons, focusing on post-2019 changes and established CVD risk factors.
Alternative Reasons for Rising Heart Attacks
- COVID-19 and Long-Term Cardiovascular Effects:
- Mechanism: SARS-CoV-2 infection can cause myocardial injury, inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction, increasing heart attack risk even in non-severe cases. A 2022 Nature study found a 63% higher risk of myocardial infarction within 12 months post-COVID, particularly in unvaccinated individuals. Long COVID may exacerbate this through chronic inflammation and autonomic dysfunction.
- Post-2019 Relevance: The pandemic began in 2020, aligning with the cited timeframe. Millions of Americans over 40 contracted COVID-19, with CDC data estimating 80% of adults had at least one infection by 2022. This could drive a significant CVD uptick, especially in those with pre-existing risk factors like hypertension (46% prevalence).
- Evidence: A 2023 AHA report notes increased CVD mortality post-COVID, with heart disease deaths rising 4% from 2019 to 2020. A 2021 JAMA study reported a 30% rise in acute myocardial infarction hospitalizations post-COVID waves.
- Vaccine-Related Myocarditis and Pericarditis:
- Mechanism: mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna) are associated with rare cases of myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly in younger males, which can strain the heart and potentially contribute to CVD risk. While most cases are mild, long-term effects are under study.
- Post-2019 Relevance: Mass vaccination began in 2021, with 70% of Americans over 40 vaccinated by mid-2022. The timing aligns with the reported heart attack rise, though the absolute risk is low (CDC estimates 0.01% incidence).
- Evidence: A 2022 Lancet study found a slight increase in myocarditis post-vaccination (3–5 cases per 100,000), but no direct link to widespread heart attacks. Critics on X speculate vaccine-related cardiac stress, but peer-reviewed data don’t support this as a primary driver.
- Lifestyle Changes Post-Pandemic:
- Mechanism: Lockdowns and remote work reduced physical activity and increased sedentary behavior, worsening cardiovascular health. Poor diet (high in processed foods) and alcohol consumption also rose, per a 2021 CDC survey. These exacerbate hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidemia, key heart attack precursors.
- Post-2019 Relevance: Lockdowns (2020–2021) disrupted exercise routines, with 60% of adults reporting less activity per a 2022 study. Diabetes prevalence rose from 13% in 2019 to 14.5% in 2022, doubling heart attack risk.
- Evidence: The AHA’s 2022 Update links inactivity to a 20% higher CVD risk, and a Cleveland Clinic report notes rising heart attacks in younger adults due to sedentary lifestyles and ultra-processed diets.
- Mental Health and General Stress (Beyond Crime):
- Mechanism: Chronic stress from economic uncertainty, social isolation, and post-pandemic anxiety raises cortisol and blood pressure, promoting atherosclerosis. Depression and anxiety, which surged post-2019, are linked to a 30% higher heart attack risk per a 2020 JAMA study.
- Post-2019 Relevance: The pandemic triggered a mental health crisis, with 40% of adults reporting anxiety/depression in 2021 (Kaiser Family Foundation). Economic stressors (inflation, job losses) persisted into 2023, affecting the over-40 demographic.
- Evidence: A 2023 AHA study notes stress as a growing CVD risk factor, with a 2021 study linking social isolation to a 15% increase in heart attack incidence.
- Substance Abuse (Excluding ADHD Stimulants):
- Mechanism: Increased use of cocaine, amphetamines (non-prescription), and opioids can trigger coronary spasms or arrhythmias, leading to heart attacks. Alcohol abuse also raises triglycerides and blood pressure.
- Post-2019 Relevance: Opioid overdoses rose 30% from 2019 to 2021 (CDC), and alcohol consumption increased 20% during lockdowns. These trends disproportionately affect adults over 40, who face higher addiction rates.
- Evidence: A 2020 AHA report links cocaine to a 7-fold heart attack risk, and a 2022 study notes alcohol’s role in 10% of CVD cases in middle-aged adults.
- Healthcare Access Disruptions:
- Mechanism: Delayed screenings and treatments during the pandemic (e.g., for hypertension, cholesterol) allowed CVD risk factors to go unmanaged. Missed statin or blood pressure medication refills increased heart attack vulnerability.
- Post-2019 Relevance: Hospitals prioritized COVID-19 cases in 2020–2021, reducing elective procedures by 50% (AHA). Many over-40 adults skipped annual checkups, per a 2022 NHANES survey.
- Evidence: A 2021 JAMA study found a 20% drop in CVD screenings from 2019 to 2020, correlating with a 10% rise in acute heart attack admissions by 2021.
Critical Evaluation
The cited drivers (ADHD stimulants, SCAD, crime stress, obesity) are less compelling than the above factors for several reasons:
- ADHD Stimulants: Evidence is weak, with no significant CVD link in large studies (e.g., 2022 meta-analysis). The 0.19% cardiomyopathy risk difference after 10 years is minimal.
- SCAD: Rare (1–2% of heart attacks) and female-specific, it’s not a broad driver.
- Crime-Related Stress: Lacks data; general stress (economic, social) is more universal and better documented.
- Obesity: A major factor (40% prevalence), but its rise pre-dates 2019, making it less specific to the post-2019 surge.
The alternative reasons are more obvious because they:
- Align with the post-2019 timeline (COVID-19, vaccines, lockdowns).
- Affect a broader population (e.g., 80% COVID exposure vs. 5% ADHD medication use).
- Have stronger mechanistic links (e.g., COVID’s myocardial injury vs. SCAD’s rarity).
- Are supported by AHA/CDC data showing CVD mortality spikes post-2020.
Chart: Key Heart Attack Risk Factors (Excluding Cited Drivers)
Risk Factor | Mechanism | Post-2019 Relevance | Evidence | Estimated Impact |
---|---|---|---|---|
COVID-19 Effects | Myocardial injury, inflammation | 80% of adults infected by 2022 | 63% higher MI risk post-COVID (Nature, 2022) | High (millions affected) |
Vaccine Myocarditis | Rare myocarditis/pericarditis | 70% vaccinated by 2022 | 0.01% incidence (Lancet, 2022) | Low (rare cases) |
Lifestyle Changes | Sedentary behavior, poor diet | 60% less active in 2020–2021 | 20% higher CVD risk (AHA, 2022) | High (widespread) |
Mental Health/Stress | Cortisol, hypertension | 40% with anxiety/depression 2021 | 15% higher MI risk (JAMA, 2021) | Moderate (affects many) |
Substance Abuse | Coronary spasms, arrhythmias | 30% rise in overdoses 2019–2021 | 7-fold MI risk with cocaine (AHA, 2020) | Moderate (specific groups) |
Healthcare Disruptions | Missed screenings/treatments | 50% drop in elective procedures 2020 | 10% rise in acute MI (JAMA, 2021) | High (systemic impact) |
Limitations and Notes
- Data Gap: The 66% figure isn’t verified in AHA/CDC data, possibly reflecting a localized study or exaggeration. General CVD trends show a 4–10% rise post-2019, not 66%.
- Confounding Factors: Many over-40 adults have multiple risk factors (e.g., hypertension, diabetes), complicating attribution. The AHA notes 90% of adults over 20 have at least one CVD risk factor.
- X Post Context: The @MarioNawfal post may amplify unverified claims, as seen in similar health debates on X. I’ve prioritized peer-reviewed data over social media.
- Minority Protections: No specific link to minority groups (per your earlier interest), but AHA notes higher CVD risk among Black, Hispanic, and Native Americans due to systemic factors like healthcare access.
Conclusion
Beyond ADHD stimulants, SCAD, crime-related stress, and obesity, more obvious reasons for a potential rise in heart attacks among Americans over 40 since 2019 include COVID-19’s cardiovascular effects, vaccine-related myocarditis (minor), post-pandemic lifestyle changes, general stress, substance abuse, and healthcare disruptions. These align with the post-2019 timeframe, affect millions, and have stronger evidence than the cited drivers. COVID-19 and lifestyle changes are the most compelling, given their scale and mechanistic clarity. The 66% figure requires verification, but these factors explain broader CVD trends. If you’d like a visual chart, deeper dive into any factor, or a search for updated data, let me know!
Day 111: What's coming up in the @FreeStateNH this week? https://t.co/MwS4rDfNvS
— Carla Gericke, Live Free And Thrive! (@CarlaGericke) April 21, 2025
Day 110 of My Living Xperiment: An exploration of self-abandonment (not sure where I'm going with this, but I'm kicking off with "when you leave yourself without telling your soul where you are going"). Happy Easter! https://t.co/EKsjaWAzCm
— Carla Gericke, Live Free And Thrive! (@CarlaGericke) April 20, 2025
📍 What Is Social Conditioning?
Social conditioning is the process by which individuals are trained—often unconsciously—to conform to societal norms, beliefs, and behaviors. It’s the operating system behind the curtain. You didn’t choose it. You inherited it.
It’s the reason you flinch at silence in a conversation.
The reason you pay taxes before buying food.
The reason you feel shame around pleasure.
The reason you say “yes” when your whole body is screaming “no.”
Social conditioning isn’t just external influence—it’s internalized control.
🕵️♂️ Who Does the Conditioning?
Follow the power.
- Governments (obedient taxpayers, loyal soldiers, compliant citizens)
- Corporations (ideal consumer = predictable, insecure, impulse-driven)
- Schools (train for obedience, not originality)
- Religions (moral codes with divine surveillance built in)
- Media (narrative framing, emotional priming, fear normalization)
- Peers & Family (enforcers of inherited rules: “That’s just how we do things”)
Each system conditions for its own survival, not for your freedom.
💣 Why Are We Conditioned?
Because controlled people are profitable, predictable, and manageable. Conditioning ensures:
- Compliance without question
- Self-policing behavior (“I don’t need to rebel—I’d feel too guilty.”)
- Tribal conformity (Don’t think, just signal the correct virtue.)
- Market segmentation (So they can sell you the illusion of choice while narrowing your worldview)
Conditioning isn’t a glitch. It’s the feature.
🛠️ How Is It Done?
1. Repetition
- “Freedom is dangerous.”
- “Authority keeps you safe.”
- “Trust the experts.”
- “Do your part.”
Say it enough, and it feels like truth.
2. Reward & Punishment
- Gold stars, likes, retweets, teacher’s pet, “good boy/girl” approval
- Shame, isolation, mockery, canceling, discipline
3. Fear
- Fear of exclusion
- Fear of poverty
- Fear of jail
- Fear of social death
- Fear of God
4. Emotion over Logic
- Media uses imagery, music, headlines to bypass your rational brain
- You don’t think your way into beliefs—you feel your way there
5. Language & Framing
- “Taxation is the price of civilization.” (vs. “coerced wealth seizure”)
- “Public health emergency.” (vs. “government panic + power grab”)
- “War on disinformation.” (vs. “war on inconvenient truths”)
6. Rituals & Symbols
- Pledges, flags, salutes, national anthems, holiday myths
- These aren’t just celebrations. They are psychic glue.
🧭 When Does It Start?
Before you could speak. Before you even had words.
- Conditioning begins in childhood with reward/punishment cycles (“Good girl!” “Bad boy!”)
- It deepens in school (“Stay in your lane. Raise your hand.”)
- It is reinforced daily by media, social norms, and social media algorithms.
We are raised to be obedient consumers, not sovereign individuals.
🧨 Signs You’ve Been Conditioned
- You feel guilt for resting.
- You feel shame around saying “no.”
- You censor yourself before speaking truth.
- You constantly seek permission or validation.
- You don’t know what you believe—you only know what’s acceptable to say.
✊ How to Break Free
- Decondition with Awareness
Ask: “Where did this belief come from?”
Did I choose this—or was I programmed to accept it? - Pause & Feel
Conditioning bypasses the body.
Reconnection starts with noticing when your stomach knots or your breath shortens.
That’s the program activating. - Opt Out Loud
Refuse the lie. Even quietly.
Say: “That doesn’t work for me anymore.”
Or louder: “I won’t comply.” - Rewild Your Mind
Read banned books.
Travel.
Meditate.
Sit in silence.
Find your own rhythm. Let your brain detox. - Reclaim Your Language
Stop using their frames.
Don’t say “anti-vaxxer.” Say “informed dissident.”
Don’t say “public servant.” Say “government employee.”
Call things what they are.
🌱 Final Thought
If the system raised you, it didn’t do so with your freedom in mind.
It taught you how to sit still.
How to please.
How to fear.
How to obey.
But you are not a widget. You are not a cog. You are not their program.
You’re a free, sovereign, sentient being.
And the first act of rebellion is to remember that.
I love that, FINALLY, I am able to (somewhat) get things out of my head in the ways I want! This is a first stab, and will likely undergo some tweaking as I evolve my thoughts (and the AI learns to post whole words properly, but it IS getting better). Onwards!
FORCE–TO–FREEDOM SPECTRUM
A gradient scale of control, from domination to consent
TERM | Definition | Power Dynamic | Examples |
---|---|---|---|
Violence | Physical harm or the threat of it to control or punish behavior. | Overt dominance via pain/fear | Assault, murder, war, torture |
Force | Physical action compelling compliance, not always injurious. | Imposition without choice | Handcuffing, restraining, detainment |
Coercion | Threat of harm or negative consequences to compel behavior. | “Do this or else…” | Blackmail, threats, extortion |
Mandate | Top-down directive with threat of punishment for disobedience. | Legal force masked as authority | Mask/vaccine mandates, military draft |
Law | Codified rules enforced by threats of penalty (fines, jail, etc.). | Socialized coercion | Taxation, drug prohibition, zoning codes |
Manipulation | Psychological tactics to influence behavior without informed consent. | Deceptive control | Gaslighting, propaganda, marketing spin |
Propaganda | Biased or misleading info spread to promote a political cause or view. | Mass manipulation | State media, war justifications, moral panic |
Persuasion | Attempt to influence using reason, emotion, or appeals—still offers choice. | Gray zone—can be ethical or exploitative | Sales pitches, speeches, PR campaigns |
Suggestion | Light influence; planting an idea or offering a path without pressure. | Minimal control; more agency retained | Therapy, coaching, open dialogue |
Education | Sharing facts or ideas to expand understanding. | Empowerment through knowledge | Real history, science, independent thinking |
Consent | Voluntary, informed agreement free from pressure or manipulation. | Sovereign choice | Signing a contract knowingly, sexual consent |
Collaboration | Mutual decision-making based on shared goals and values. | Power-with, not power-over | Partnerships, co-ops, community building |
Peace | The absence of coercion, conflict, or domination; respect for others’ autonomy. | Balance, self-ownership, live and let live | Voluntaryism, anarchy, harmony |
🧩 Why This Matters
Most people live their lives being pushed around somewhere in the middle, never recognizing how far from true consent they’ve drifted. When someone says, “You agreed,” but your job, reputation, access to your kids, or your bodily autonomy was on the line? That’s not consent. That’s a mandate. That’s coercion in a suit and tie.
This chart lets you say:
“Let’s name what that really was.”
🛠️ Teaching Tool Uses
- Mind Control Decoder: Help people identify where their choices have been influenced.
- Classroom Aid: Great for liberty-curious folks, homeschoolers, or personal development workshops.
- Activism Tool: Pair it with real-world examples (e.g., Covid mandates vs. informed medical choice).
- Personal Healing: Survivors of abuse or authoritarianism often confuse coercion for love or safety—this helps reframe.
🌡️ Expanded Force–to–Freedom Spectrum (with 10 New Nuance Points)
From domination ➜ to mind control ➜ to sovereign choice
🔴 ZONE 1: Domination (Overt Power-Over)
- Violence – Infliction of pain, injury, or death to impose control.
- Brute Force – Physical control without necessarily inflicting harm (e.g., body-slamming, dragging).
- Threats – Intimidation with promised harm if demands aren’t met (emotional, physical, financial).
- Detention – Confinement or deprivation of movement (jail, quarantine, lockdown).
🟠 ZONE 2: Legal & Institutionalized Control
- Force (Legal) – Application of power backed by institutional authority (e.g., police enforcing a law).
- Mandate – Top-down command with penalty (no jab, no job).
- Sanction – Economic or social penalty imposed for noncompliance (e.g., trade bans, funding cuts).
- Decree – Unilateral executive order with legal force but no deliberative process.
- Law – Codified behavioral rules enforced by the state, often backed by the threat of violence.
- Regulation – Bureaucratic rules shaping behavior with civil penalties or business repercussions.
🟡 ZONE 3: Psychological & Cultural Coercion
- Ostracism – Social exclusion as a pressure tactic (“Just unfriend them or I will…”).
- Shaming – Using guilt, moral outrage, or humiliation to push compliance (“You’re selfish if you don’t…”).
- Propaganda – Systematic shaping of perception via selective or manipulative information.
- Manipulation – Indirect influence without informed consent; often emotional or strategic.
- Gaslighting – Distorting reality to make someone doubt their perception, memory, or judgment.
- Social Conditioning – Long-term programming of beliefs via media, school, norms, etc.
- Compliance Culture – Internalized obedience (“Good citizens follow the rules, no questions asked”).
🟢 ZONE 4: Influence Without Coercion
- Persuasion – Attempt to influence through reason, emotion, or appeal; choice still exists.
- Nudging – Subtle design tweaks to steer behavior (e.g., defaults, framing).
- Suggestion – Offering ideas or options without pressure.
- Influence – Impact on decisions through relationship, trust, or authority (e.g., mentors, elders).
🔵 ZONE 5: Sovereign Interaction (True Consent & Peace)
- Education – Empowering people with knowledge and context to make informed decisions.
- Informed Consent – Voluntary agreement with full awareness of risks, benefits, and alternatives.
- Mutual Agreement – Two or more parties freely choosing terms based on aligned interest.
- Collaboration – Shared effort, goals, and input toward a co-created result.
- Autonomy – Self-direction without external interference.
- Consent – Affirmative, voluntary participation in word, spirit, and energy.
- Peace – Absence of domination; presence of respect, sovereignty, and choice.
🧩 Teaching Metaphor
Imagine these zones as color-coded layers of the human experience:
- Red = the whip
- Orange = the rulebook
- Yellow = the trickster
- Green = the guide
- Blue = the sovereign
The more “red” a relationship, institution, or interaction is… the more you are being controlled. The more “blue” it is… the more you are free.
Yes! Here’s a Control Translator Cheat Sheet—designed to help people quickly decode the language of power and influence used on them in everyday life.
This can serve as a practical, printable guide or flashcard-style resource for workshops, one-on-ones, or personal self-defense against coercion.
🧠 Control Translator Cheat Sheet
“What they said” vs. “What they really meant”
🔴 Red Zone: Dominance (Force & Threats)
What they say | What’s really happening |
---|---|
“Comply or else.” | Threat/Coercion: You’re being forced under duress. |
“It’s the law.” | Legal Force: Backed by threats (fines, jail, etc.). |
“You don’t have a choice.” | Domination: Consent is being bypassed entirely. |
“This is for your own good.” | Paternalism: Justifying force without input. |
🟠 Orange Zone: Pressure with Rules or Punishment
What they say | What’s really happening |
---|---|
“It’s a mandate.” | Non-negotiable command under threat. |
“You’ll lose access if you don’t comply.” | Conditional coercion: A threat wrapped in policy. |
“You signed the terms of service.” | Coerced consent: You didn’t really have a choice. |
“We’re just following regulations.” | Diffusion of responsibility: Bureaucratic coercion. |
🟡 Yellow Zone: Psychological & Social Pressure
What they say | What’s really happening |
---|---|
“Everyone agrees with this.” | Propaganda: Manufacturing consensus. |
“Only a selfish person would disagree.” | Shaming as compliance strategy. |
“You’re imagining things.” | Gaslighting: Undermining your perception. |
“If you loved me, you’d do it.” | Emotional blackmail. |
“You can’t sit with us.” | Ostracism as behavioral correction. |
“It’s for the greater good.” | Utilitarian manipulation: Sacrificing you for the group. |
🟢 Green Zone: Soft Influence or Ethical Dialogue
What they say | What’s really happening |
---|---|
“Have you considered this alternative?” | Suggestion: Gentle influence, still your choice. |
“Most people prefer this option.” | Nudge: Behavioral framing, but not mandatory. |
“I’d love to hear your thoughts.” | Dialogue: Respect for your perspective. |
“Here’s the data—make your own call.” | Education or informed persuasion. |
🔵 Blue Zone: Consent & Collaboration
What they say | What’s really happening |
---|---|
“Do you want to participate?” | Consent: True, voluntary engagement. |
“Let’s decide this together.” | Collaboration: Power with, not power over. |
“You can change your mind anytime.” | Ongoing consent honored. |
“I trust your judgment.” | Autonomy respected. |
🛠️ HOW TO USE THIS:
- Pause. When you feel discomfort or pressure, ask yourself: “Where on the spectrum is this?”
- Translate. Use the cheat sheet to decode whether it’s real choice—or dressed-up coercion.
- Respond. Reclaim your power by naming what’s happening: “This feels more like a threat than a conversation.”
