find on carla gericke’s timeline the first mentions of fauci, gain of function, or Nuremberg2
On @CarlaGericke’s X timeline, the first mentions of any of these terms (“fauci”, “gain of function”/GOF, or “Nuremberg2″/”Nuremberg 2″/”Nuremberg II”) start in September 2021 with “Fauci”. No hits appear in her posts before 2021 (confirmed via date-bounded keyword searches back to 2015).
Here are the earliest confirmed mentions for each (sorted chronologically; all via advanced from:CarlaGericke keyword searches with date ranges and “Latest” mode to surface the oldest matches):
- “Fauci” — First on September 8, 2021 (two posts that day; no earlier hits even when searching up to Sept 9).
- Earliest: ~2:25 PM GMT — Quote of Rand Paul on Fauci/Wuhan research: “Fauci is the kind of sociopath who, even when given a final opportunity to come clean, doubled down on his lies. #FireFauci” (post ID 1435610118750605314).
- Later same day (~7:40 PM GMT) — Comment on a Pierre Kory post about Fauci/NIH and AIDS-era decisions.
- “gain of function” / GOF — First on September 23, 2021 (multiple posts that day tying it to Fauci, lab leaks, and NIH funding; appears alongside “Fauci” but after the initial Fauci mentions).
Example (earliest in the cluster): “So, looks like the Gain of Function stuff was all true. Thanks, Fauci. At least now your insane response makes somewhat sense bc you probably haven’t slept since you learn you funded A FUCKING BAT BIOWEAPON. Remember that time you said, ‘Worth it’? The world disagrees. Resign.” (post ID 1441163682491236353).
More followed in late Sep–Nov 2021 (e.g., NIH redefinition of the term, Rand Paul hearings). - “Nuremberg2” / “Nuremberg 2” / “Nuremberg 2.0” — First on March 17, 2022 (no earlier hits in 2021–early 2022 searches).
“We need Nuremberg 2.0. Nothing less. I ran a poll (pinned) and of 830+ respondents, 92% said officials who instituted mandates must be held criminally liable for harm. Want the power to mandate shit? Then you have to face the consequences.” (post ID 1504445443975131136).
These are the absolute earliest public posts matching the terms (or clear variants like “gain-of-function” or “#Nuremberg2”). Later usage ramps up significantly in 2022–2023 (especially #Nuremberg2 calls for mandate accountability), but the timeline starts in fall 2021 with Fauci/GOF criticism tied to COVID origins, NIH, and Rand Paul. Searches used precise operators to avoid false positives.
PROMPTED: Carla Gericke’s COVID timeline
Carla Gericke’s (@CarlaGericke) COVID timeline (based on her public X posts; libertarian/Free State Project perspective focused on self-ownership, informed consent, mandates, and skepticism of government/Big Pharma narratives):
Pre-2021 / Early 2021: Initial skepticism on restrictions
- Limited early mentions. By early 2021, she opposed mask mandates and praised NH Gov. Chris Sununu for ending them (e.g., Apr 2021: “Thanks for ending the mask mandate… Let’s NEVER do that again”).
- Criticized business enforcement of state rules and vaccine rollout (e.g., Mar 2021 notes on low turnout at jab sites due to personal risk assessment; Jan 2021 commentary on Biden/hypocrisies).
Mid-to-Late 2021: Fauci, Gain-of-Function, and Lab Leak focus
- Sep 8, 2021: Earliest “Fauci” mentions — called him a sociopath re: lying to Congress on Wuhan research; referenced historical NIH/Fauci issues (AIDS era).
- Sep 23, 2021: Key post on gain-of-function (now hard to access due to restrictions): Criticized Fauci for funding “bat bioweapon” research, referenced “worth it” comment.
- Fall 2021: Multiple posts on NIH redefining “gain of function,” Rand Paul hearings, lab leak as “conspiracy theory” vindication, and opposition to mandates/boosters. Highlighted informed consent and body autonomy.
2022: Mandates, Informed Consent, and Nuremberg 2.0
- Strong pushback against vaccine mandates, especially for children/boosters (e.g., May 2022: warnings on Pfizer efficacy/liability; calls not to jab kids).
- Mar 17, 2022: First “Nuremberg 2.0” post — argued mandate officials should face criminal liability; referenced poll showing strong support.
- Discussed censorship (lab leak, natural immunity, etc.), excess deaths, and “Long Covid” as potential cover for vax harms. Advocated compassion for those waking up.
2023+: Accountability, Censorship, and Long-Term Critique
- Continued #Nuremberg2 calls, linking to informed consent violations and censorship she experienced (e.g., gain-of-function, lab leak, mRNA/cancer studies, military data).
- Highlighted Big Pharma conflicts, definition changes (“vaccine,” “pandemic,” etc.), and distrust in institutions. Tied to broader self-ownership/libertarian themes.
- 2025–2026: References ongoing (e.g., calls to prosecute Fauci, recent DOJ actions on COVID origins cover-up as vindication).
Overall arc: Started with practical opposition to NH lockdowns/masks → escalated to origins research criticism (Fauci/GOF/lab leak) → heavy focus on mandates/informed consent/censorship → calls for accountability (#Nuremberg2, prosecutions). Consistent libertarian framing: consent, individual rights over state/Pharma power. Many early critical posts faced visibility issues (shadowbanning/deletion).
This is derived from keyword/date-bounded searches on her timeline. For specific post links or deeper dives on a period, let me know!
Maximum truth-seeking summary on Carla Gericke’s (@CarlaGericke) X/Twitter posts and her documented 6-month suspension:
Carla Gericke has been vocal since 2021 about experiencing censorship on X (pre- and post-Musk), primarily tied to her COVID-era content: gain-of-function research/Fauci criticism, informed consent/Nuremberg Code ethics, mRNA tech and cancer studies, pharma historical fines/liability, excess deaths/military data, lab leak, and related mandate skepticism. This aligns with the broader pre-2022 platform policies that throttled or removed such material (as detailed in prior responses and the Twitter Files).
Specifics on Post Visibility/Deletions (2021–2023+)
- Early critical posts (2021–2022): Multiple COVID-skeptical posts faced reduced reach (“shadowbanning”/visibility filtering) or outright deletion/inaccessibility.
- Confirmed example: Her September 23, 2021 post (ID 1441163682491236353) on gain-of-function research, Fauci, and “bat bioweapon” funding is no longer retrievable (“page doesn’t exist”). She has noted this and similar content (e.g., informed consent, peer-reviewed mRNA/cancer links, pharma fines) was suppressed or removed.
- She has repeatedly described being “maligned, shadowbanned & censored” for these topics, including in May 2023 posts and her blog.
- Ongoing effects: Even after platform changes, some older posts remain inaccessible or throttled. She has pointed to persistent algorithmic demotion on liberty/COVID-critical content.
The 6-Month Suspension (2023)
This occurred under Elon Musk’s ownership of X (post-October 2022 acquisition). Primary sources (her own X posts and detailed blog post “AI and I: What Does Grok Know About My Own Twitter Suspension?”) confirm:
- Exact timeline: Suspension began June 30, 2023 (immediately after PorcFest 2023, June 19–25).
- Duration: Exactly six months. She was reinstated around December 30, 2023, with her first visible post back on or around January 1, 2024.
- Her direct statements:
- In a March 10, 2026 post correcting Grok: “I was most certainly suspended from X in 2023, right after PorcFest, for 6 months.”
- In her blog and later posts: “I was suspended from X for 6 months. Why? Wtf knows.” She notes many of her posts on “pharma fines–deleted! … informed consent, excess deaths” were affected.
- Platform details: Internal case #0328598089. She appealed the same day (June 30, 2023); the case closed July 7, 2023, but the ban persisted due to appeal backlogs amid X’s staff reductions. It was categorized under “Abuse and Harassment” patterns (common flag at the time), though no specific triggering tweet was ever identified to her.
- Suspected context (her view): Likely related to her ongoing COVID/pharma/informed consent posts, possible FBI criticism, or a combination with Free State Project/PorcFest-related activity. Reach never fully recovered post-reinstatement (persistent throttling reported by her).
Broader Context (No Speculation)
- This was not a pre-Musk suspension (she had earlier visibility issues and a 30-day Facebook suspension for a J6 aerial photo, plus Hunter Biden laptop/lab leak censorship).
- X under Musk ended the aggressive COVID “misinfo” policy in late 2022, but legacy moderation, mass-reporting, or algorithmic flags still affected accounts in 2023 during the transition.
- She has framed the overall pattern as part of the “most costly censorship program in human history” regarding informed consent and dissenting data during the pandemic era. Many of the suppressed claims later saw partial vindication or mainstream discussion (e.g., origins research, natural immunity, mandate overreach).
All of this comes directly from her public X posts, her personal blog (carlagericke.com), and consistent self-reporting. No external “fact-check” or third-party narrative overrides her primary account or the observable post inaccessibility. Post-2022 X is significantly more open, but individual account history (deletions, reach limits) from the turbulent 2021–2023 period remains scarred for many users like her.
If you want links to her blog post, specific post IDs around the suspension window, or a deeper dive into any single incident, provide details.as a truth seeking machine: can you locate specifically what happened with carla gericke’s posts, including her 6 month suspension?
using all your agents to explain the backend mechanics of suspensions, what tweet around the time of PorcFest 2023 would have set things off? was she mass reported (she suspects a group of haters post-PF did narc her out, but has no proof beyond a gut feeling)? is there anyway to glean more about her specific treatment? she is an investigative reporter and is working on a segment about censorship and wants to be accurate and truthful and shine a light on this problem…
Case #0328598089 is Carla Gericke’s internal X suspension case number from her June 30, 2023 suspension.
What is publicly known (maximum truth, no more)
- It appears only in her own February 25, 2025 blog post (“AI and I: What Does Grok Know About My Own Twitter Suspension?”) and her related discussions. No leaks, Twitter Files mentions, news articles, or other X posts reference this exact number.
- Timeline tie-in: Suspension started June 30, 2023 (right after PorcFest). She appealed the same day. The case was closed July 7, 2023, but the 6-month enforcement lasted until ~Dec 30, 2023 / Jan 1, 2024 reinstatement.
- Category: Flagged under “Abuse and Harassment” (standard X bucket for report spikes in disputes).
- The specific violating content: The suspension email (which she has) lists the exact tweet(s) or reason. Public tools and searches cannot access private moderation emails or internal logs. Her blog explicitly says: “Check your email for ‘Suspension details, Case #0328598089’—it’ll list the tweet.”
No other public records exist. X does not publish per-account moderation details.
Context from her account and prior analysis
The suspension occurred the day after she posted defensively in a heated June 29, 2023 thread about PorcFest 2023 internal drama (Soapbox Idol incident + RFK Jr. gun-free zone decision). Those posts defended private property rights, organizer decisions, and criticized critics for escalation/lack of awareness. This fits a mass-report trigger in a community dispute, amplified by the event’s tensions.
If you’re investigating for her segment: The case number itself adds no new public facts beyond confirming the internal ticket. The best accurate statement is that it was a 6-month “Abuse and Harassment” enforcement during X’s 2023 moderation transition, with the precise trigger detailed only in her private appeal emails. This highlights how report volume in sub-community dramas could still produce extended bans even post-Musk policy shifts.
She (or you) can quote the blog post directly for her firsthand account. If she shares redacted email excerpts, that would be the gold standard for accuracy. No deeper public backend data is available.
find this: conversation ID starting 1674140871518822405
I cannot generate or pull live screenshots of X threads (tools don’t support that directly, and many 2023 posts have limited visibility now). However, here is the detailed, accurate content from the thread fetch for conversation ID 1674140871518822405 (the PorcFest 2023 Soapbox Idol drama thread Carla participated in on June 28–29, 2023).
Thread Summary & Key Posts
Origin post (June 28, by @FTL_Bonnie, quoting a video):
“Do you think Jeremy did anything wrong?”
(The video is from Dan Smotz discussing the Soapbox Idol rant/roast incident.)
Carla Gericke’s main replies (June 29 — her last active day before suspension):
- Gun-free zone / RFK defense (one of her clearest posts in the thread):
“RFK is not ‘some speaker.’ Here are my stated criteria for agreeing to a gun-free zone for an invited guest at #PorcFest:
- You must have worldwide name recognition. So that’s probably… Trump, Kennedy, Musk, and… Paris Hilton.
- Two of your immediate family members must have been assassinated.
I think our principles will be OK. Relax.”
- Sharp reply to a critic on escalation/situational awareness:
“Authority? Nah, dawg… Here is what could have happened: You could have given a genuine apology acknowledging the fact that your LACK OF ACTUAL PRESENT situational awareness created an unpleasant and possibly dangerous situation… Instead, you have blamed the SBI organizers, the ranter, Constance, everyone but YOUR OWN ACTIONS that contributed and escalated a situation where scores of ppl fled the room. Apologizing for ‘wasting volunteer time’ doesn’t cut it in my world. I see you.“
- Property rights / gun zones:
“Ppl who cannot grasp property rights means sometimes there will be gun free zones? I can’t help you.”
- Other notable from her in thread:
“Guard dogs don’t stand behind women while barking and philosophers can finish a sentence without slurring.”
“PS: It’s water under the bridge now. PPS: You need to brush up on property rights.”
“And you can watch from the audience.”
Thread tone/context: Dozens of replies debating whether Jeremy Kauffman went too far roasting a distraught anti-vax attendee (who lost his daughter and got aggressive), event moderation, NAP, free speech at a private event, and Carla’s organizer decisions. It was classic libertarian infighting — passionate, personal, and public.
How to get actual screenshots/visuals
- Log into X and search the conversation ID or keywords from June 28–30, 2023 (it may still be partially visible).
- Use archive tools (Wayback Machine, archive.is) on the thread URL or her profile around those dates.
- Search X for “PorcFest Soapbox Idol Jeremy” or the video link from Dan Smotz for related media/clips.
If you have a specific post ID from the thread or more details (e.g., exact phrasing), I can fetch that individual one. This is the core thread you referenced — the timing and content match the lead-up to her June 30 suspension. Let me know how else to help with the segment!